<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Indie Skeptics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indieskeptics.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indieskeptics.com</link>
	<description>Independent Skeptics writing about issues that matter.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weight Loss of a Skeptic by Wedding Favors</title>
		<link>http://indieskeptics.com/2011/03/09/weight-loss-of-a-skeptic/comment-page-1/#comment-1551</link>
		<dc:creator>Wedding Favors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 23:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indieskeptics.com/?p=697#comment-1551</guid>
		<description>A job well done! Congrats on your weight loss journey. So many times we set ourselves up to fail, because we expect the weight to come off quickly.  A good alternative to pasta is spaghetti squash which is a low gylcemic veggie and a healthy choice - toss it with a little bit of olive oil and Parmesan cheese or top it with meat sauce and you may not even miss pasta!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A job well done! Congrats on your weight loss journey. So many times we set ourselves up to fail, because we expect the weight to come off quickly.  A good alternative to pasta is spaghetti squash which is a low gylcemic veggie and a healthy choice &#8211; toss it with a little bit of olive oil and Parmesan cheese or top it with meat sauce and you may not even miss pasta!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Happens When Critical Thinking is Ignored by Tracy</title>
		<link>http://indieskeptics.com/2011/04/12/what-happens-when-critical-thinking-is-ignored/comment-page-1/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indieskeptics.com/?p=754#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
— Thomas Sowell

Unfortunately, I&#039;m experiencing this frustration in the field of Human Services and Vermont State Government.  It&#039;s a dangerous combination, moral superiority and Ignorance, as well as Human Services and Vermont State Government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”<br />
— Thomas Sowell</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I&#8217;m experiencing this frustration in the field of Human Services and Vermont State Government.  It&#8217;s a dangerous combination, moral superiority and Ignorance, as well as Human Services and Vermont State Government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Skepticism Is To Atheism Like Car Is To House…Really? by On atheism and skepticism &#124; The Thinker</title>
		<link>http://indieskeptics.com/2010/10/04/skepticism-is-to-atheism-like-car-is-to-house%e2%80%a6really/comment-page-1/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>On atheism and skepticism &#124; The Thinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indieskeptics.com/?p=191#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>[...] IndieSkeptics blog (newly added to my blogroll) has a nice post on skepticism and atheism. It seems that saying “you can’t be a Skeptic if you are not an Atheist” is the No True [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] IndieSkeptics blog (newly added to my blogroll) has a nice post on skepticism and atheism. It seems that saying “you can’t be a Skeptic if you are not an Atheist” is the No True [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are Atheists Delusional? Thoughts on Skepticon3 by Rob, Robot Vacuum</title>
		<link>http://indieskeptics.com/2010/11/16/are-atheists-delusional-thoughts-on-skepticon3/comment-page-2/#comment-1547</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob, Robot Vacuum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indieskeptics.com/?p=396#comment-1547</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Rich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Rich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Justice by Ruby</title>
		<link>http://indieskeptics.com/2011/08/20/justice/comment-page-1/#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 06:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indieskeptics.com/?p=865#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>I know that this story is way out of date now (at least in terms of the current trend of up-to-the-second news where anything that happened more than a week ago is practically irrelevant), but I just wanted to thank you for putting this out there. I entirely agree, and I was equally shocked by the backlash of the Casey Anthony trial. I didn&#039;t follow it too closely through most of the trial, but near the end I took an interest and spent a day or two sifting through all of the publicly available information I could find (affidavits, autopsy reports, etc) and I had to reach the same conclusion the jury did... It was pretty obvious to me from a circumstantial perspective that she was guilty, but there was no hard evidence that could prove beyond a reasonable doubt (as is the test required by law) that she had done it.

 Her actions after the disappearance were more than questionable and in many ways she appeared to be heartless and callous, but without facts to prove that she was guilty, it would have been a travesty of justice to have convicted her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know that this story is way out of date now (at least in terms of the current trend of up-to-the-second news where anything that happened more than a week ago is practically irrelevant), but I just wanted to thank you for putting this out there. I entirely agree, and I was equally shocked by the backlash of the Casey Anthony trial. I didn&#8217;t follow it too closely through most of the trial, but near the end I took an interest and spent a day or two sifting through all of the publicly available information I could find (affidavits, autopsy reports, etc) and I had to reach the same conclusion the jury did&#8230; It was pretty obvious to me from a circumstantial perspective that she was guilty, but there was no hard evidence that could prove beyond a reasonable doubt (as is the test required by law) that she had done it.</p>
<p> Her actions after the disappearance were more than questionable and in many ways she appeared to be heartless and callous, but without facts to prove that she was guilty, it would have been a travesty of justice to have convicted her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weight Loss of a Skeptic by Vegetable slicers</title>
		<link>http://indieskeptics.com/2011/03/09/weight-loss-of-a-skeptic/comment-page-1/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegetable slicers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indieskeptics.com/?p=697#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m making a picture slideshow for class about a loved one. I need some good songs to put on the background. I&#039;m specifically doing the slideshow on how grateful I am for having my brother as a person which I get along with. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m making a picture slideshow for class about a loved one. I need some good songs to put on the background. I&#8217;m specifically doing the slideshow on how grateful I am for having my brother as a person which I get along with. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Justice by James Cates</title>
		<link>http://indieskeptics.com/2011/08/20/justice/comment-page-1/#comment-1529</link>
		<dc:creator>James Cates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indieskeptics.com/?p=865#comment-1529</guid>
		<description>It is maddeningly frustrating to realize the agonizingly slow, incremental pace of progress of our species. And just as people readily resort to the phrase, &quot;Oh well, it could always be worse&quot;, so they take (or try to take) comfort from comparing our present with our past by recalling the Medieval madness of scapegoating Jews for The Black Plague, or irrational fear of tomatoes and bathing, etc.
But evolution&#039;s perspective on time&#039;s passage is a good deal different from that of any one of us. The comfort I take, when I can, is in the dream that we may one day evolve to a stage where, on reflection, the legal constraints we impose now will seem superfluous and quaint. 
&quot;Isn&#039;t it amazing that those ancients actually needed laws to control those impulses? Positively barbaric!&quot;
It is encouraging, though, that Enlightenment concepts seem (I say, seem) perhaps more natural now than a handful of centuries ago. That&#039;s a good thing, I have to believe. 
It&#039;s discouraging that people must constantly be reminded; even cajoled into recollection of the very things you&#039;ve pointed out in this piece. However, it&#039;s encouraging that we live in a polity where those concepts are enshrined in law, and that, over the course of the last two hundred years, these ideas seem to be honored, progressively, more in reality than merely in the breach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is maddeningly frustrating to realize the agonizingly slow, incremental pace of progress of our species. And just as people readily resort to the phrase, &#8220;Oh well, it could always be worse&#8221;, so they take (or try to take) comfort from comparing our present with our past by recalling the Medieval madness of scapegoating Jews for The Black Plague, or irrational fear of tomatoes and bathing, etc.<br />
But evolution&#8217;s perspective on time&#8217;s passage is a good deal different from that of any one of us. The comfort I take, when I can, is in the dream that we may one day evolve to a stage where, on reflection, the legal constraints we impose now will seem superfluous and quaint.<br />
&#8220;Isn&#8217;t it amazing that those ancients actually needed laws to control those impulses? Positively barbaric!&#8221;<br />
It is encouraging, though, that Enlightenment concepts seem (I say, seem) perhaps more natural now than a handful of centuries ago. That&#8217;s a good thing, I have to believe.<br />
It&#8217;s discouraging that people must constantly be reminded; even cajoled into recollection of the very things you&#8217;ve pointed out in this piece. However, it&#8217;s encouraging that we live in a polity where those concepts are enshrined in law, and that, over the course of the last two hundred years, these ideas seem to be honored, progressively, more in reality than merely in the breach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Defense Of Ted Haggard by Brian Walsh</title>
		<link>http://indieskeptics.com/2011/08/17/in-defense-of-ted-haggard/comment-page-1/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 19:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indieskeptics.com/?p=856#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>When you&#039;re a fundamentalist, you exist in a closed ecosystem. Many gay Christians have no other opinions coming in at all. I really feel bad for all of them. Even Ted Haggard, though less so. He obviously knows better, he even hired a prostitute.

@Meettheskeptics Good point. I have no sweet tooth. If fact, I generally dislike chocolate and have little interest in sugar. It isn&#039;t willpower, it&#039;s lack of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you&#8217;re a fundamentalist, you exist in a closed ecosystem. Many gay Christians have no other opinions coming in at all. I really feel bad for all of them. Even Ted Haggard, though less so. He obviously knows better, he even hired a prostitute.</p>
<p>@Meettheskeptics Good point. I have no sweet tooth. If fact, I generally dislike chocolate and have little interest in sugar. It isn&#8217;t willpower, it&#8217;s lack of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Defense Of Ted Haggard by rationalrevolution</title>
		<link>http://indieskeptics.com/2011/08/17/in-defense-of-ted-haggard/comment-page-1/#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>rationalrevolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indieskeptics.com/?p=856#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;ve long said this. To put a finer point on it, I think that many anti-gay activists who are gay themselves believe that homosexuals are horrible perverted people because they themselves are.

They hate themselves, they know that they are themselves gay, they believe that being gay is wrong, and then because they believe that being gay is wrong they live a closeted lifestyle of denial, which in and of itself creates all kinds of conflicts and perversions, which they then attribute to all homosexuals.

So, for example, some gay man who is a fundamentalist Christian may marry a woman, try to be a good father, try not to &quot;be gay&quot;, and in the process they get depressed, have thoughts of suicide, may make attempts at molesting boys since they are easy targets or at least have thoughts about it, etc. all of which is brought about not from &quot;being gay&quot;, but from being closeted.

And from their experience they believe that this is what being gay is like, and its bad, so they come out against it, and when you hear them saying all these bad things about the character of gay people, they are really talking about themselves and projected themselves onto all gay people.

And not only that, but taking the &quot;idle hands are the Devil&#039;s workshop&quot; mentality they occupy their time with anti-gay activism as a means of trying to &quot;self-medicate&quot; their own gay denial. In other words, denying their own homosexuality is so painful that they anti-gay activism is a useful distraction that they use to try and keep themselves away from homosexuality. Maybe they feel that their anti-gay activities will either cure themselves or at least prevent them from acting on their desires by occupying their time and reminding themselves how bad those desires are.

It is quite sad really. It is also something the gay community will hopefully get better at dealing with, knowing that, in fact, some of the strongest enemies of gay rights are themselves closeted gay people. It&#039;s a difficult situation.  Imagine if the biggest opponents of the Civil Rights movement were blacks. There is no such thing as a closeted black though, so that&#039;s why that didn&#039;t happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;ve long said this. To put a finer point on it, I think that many anti-gay activists who are gay themselves believe that homosexuals are horrible perverted people because they themselves are.</p>
<p>They hate themselves, they know that they are themselves gay, they believe that being gay is wrong, and then because they believe that being gay is wrong they live a closeted lifestyle of denial, which in and of itself creates all kinds of conflicts and perversions, which they then attribute to all homosexuals.</p>
<p>So, for example, some gay man who is a fundamentalist Christian may marry a woman, try to be a good father, try not to &#8220;be gay&#8221;, and in the process they get depressed, have thoughts of suicide, may make attempts at molesting boys since they are easy targets or at least have thoughts about it, etc. all of which is brought about not from &#8220;being gay&#8221;, but from being closeted.</p>
<p>And from their experience they believe that this is what being gay is like, and its bad, so they come out against it, and when you hear them saying all these bad things about the character of gay people, they are really talking about themselves and projected themselves onto all gay people.</p>
<p>And not only that, but taking the &#8220;idle hands are the Devil&#8217;s workshop&#8221; mentality they occupy their time with anti-gay activism as a means of trying to &#8220;self-medicate&#8221; their own gay denial. In other words, denying their own homosexuality is so painful that they anti-gay activism is a useful distraction that they use to try and keep themselves away from homosexuality. Maybe they feel that their anti-gay activities will either cure themselves or at least prevent them from acting on their desires by occupying their time and reminding themselves how bad those desires are.</p>
<p>It is quite sad really. It is also something the gay community will hopefully get better at dealing with, knowing that, in fact, some of the strongest enemies of gay rights are themselves closeted gay people. It&#8217;s a difficult situation.  Imagine if the biggest opponents of the Civil Rights movement were blacks. There is no such thing as a closeted black though, so that&#8217;s why that didn&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In Defense Of Ted Haggard by Meettheskeptics</title>
		<link>http://indieskeptics.com/2011/08/17/in-defense-of-ted-haggard/comment-page-1/#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Meettheskeptics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indieskeptics.com/?p=856#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>Well put Brian. The same realization hit me only a few years back. I had heard preachers talk about men wrestling with the temptation of homosexuality and all I could ever think was &quot;what temptation???&quot; The argument just seemed so odd, but I just chalked it up as if the preacher was arguing that certain people are burdened with this while other aren&#039;t. Of course, that wasn&#039;t what they were saying. 

I marvel at how others can so easily avoid sweets, but that&#039;s because I have an incredibly annoying sweet tooth that causes me to crave unhealthy stuff. It could just be that many other people aren&#039;t so tempted &amp; that&#039;s why it&#039;s so easy for them to take a pass on dessert. Still, I instinctively see it as if they have stronger willpower than me. The only difference is that I can rationally understand that not everyone feels the same temptations I feel. These preachers don&#039;t seem to make that connection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put Brian. The same realization hit me only a few years back. I had heard preachers talk about men wrestling with the temptation of homosexuality and all I could ever think was &#8220;what temptation???&#8221; The argument just seemed so odd, but I just chalked it up as if the preacher was arguing that certain people are burdened with this while other aren&#8217;t. Of course, that wasn&#8217;t what they were saying. </p>
<p>I marvel at how others can so easily avoid sweets, but that&#8217;s because I have an incredibly annoying sweet tooth that causes me to crave unhealthy stuff. It could just be that many other people aren&#8217;t so tempted &amp; that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s so easy for them to take a pass on dessert. Still, I instinctively see it as if they have stronger willpower than me. The only difference is that I can rationally understand that not everyone feels the same temptations I feel. These preachers don&#8217;t seem to make that connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: indieskeptics.com @ 2012-05-18 10:33:30 -->
